48 Comments

1. 

   @kkkiren599

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   Bakhmut has little strategic relevance other than being a meat grinder of expendable humans.

   Log in to Reply
2. 

   @conantroutman4535

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   Tl:dr be like:
   -Russians can't take Bakhmut
   -Russians takes Bakhmut (But Ukraine wins)
   -Russians stand for Bakhmut, (but no problem Mykola, you have 1,5 wunderwaffe to win)
   You are here
   -Russians takes a Kupyansk, and this is why Ukraine can win (maybe)
   -The counter counteroffensive may save more lives in the trenches of Kyiv, because Polish government invaded Lviv

   What a time to be alive

   Log in to Reply
3. 

   @aliaburub403

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   Hahahahaha ur so delusional … wake up russia is kicking their a**

   Log in to Reply
4. 

   @jondoe1622

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   YES WE CAN!! BWAH-AH-AH!

   Log in to Reply
5. 

   @exrk1647

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO lil bro said BACKMÜÜT

   Log in to Reply
6. 

   @baileygregory9192

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   I thought Bakmut was strategically not important thats what the west said when bakmut fell but now ukrianian is on the offensive around the area irs now inportant

   Log in to Reply
7. 

   @giolag5593

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   The amount of effort put in making the so far failure of the counteroffensive look as smart strategy is hilarious

   Log in to Reply
8. 

   @tivmego

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   Who is giving this kid internet spaces? 😂😂😂

   Log in to Reply
9. 

   @Chris-wh3yz

   February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

   Bakhmut is not that important to Russia. They may leave that area least guarded giving Ukraine a place to go only to become a meat grinder.

   Taking it is no real victory

   Log in to Reply
10. 

    @zenkai121

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    this war reminds me of north and south korea with less nations giving men but equipment

    Log in to Reply
11. 

    @peterlangan1181

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    In a word No!

    Log in to Reply
12. 

    @Testwest78

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    ROFL!

    Log in to Reply
13. 

    @jorgeyamane6655

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    It took NINE months for Russians to take Bakhmut. Ukraine if we remember is a small army comparing with Russia`s Federeation.

    Log in to Reply
14. 

    @Xardas131

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Yeah….the rise of paywalls…

    Log in to Reply
15. 

    @nonyabisness6306

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    "attritional strategy" Sorry, but that's not strategy, you only do that if you have no other choice.

    Log in to Reply
16. 

    @user-hw8vy8wk3x

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Ukrainian could not do s*** in this operation 🤣

    Log in to Reply
17. 

    @guerrilla1044

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    There's nothing strategic about this city

    Log in to Reply
18. 

    @davidmiller5028

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    "Backmut is of no significant importance" tldr

    Log in to Reply
19. 

    @davidmiller5028

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    No

    Log in to Reply
20. 

    @adammacleod5046

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    I completely, 100% support Ukraine but why in the fuck are they wasting resources trying to retake this city so hard? Is it not rubble? Should they not be pressing towards Crimea? Maybe I am not understanding something.

    Log in to Reply
21. 

    @maninredhelm

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    I think this is ultimately down to Bakhmut being the only Russian occupied territory in which the Russians didn't have time to build good defenses, making it the softest target available. Otherwise it would be a low priority.

    Log in to Reply
22. 

    @Llkc60

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    this headline stinks of the operation itself being done for the media. Facts are that it is very hard to breakthrough defensive lines that have been fortified for a year. In some cases double or triple lines. Anti-tank obstacles, dug in trenches, anti-armor warfare positions. They can't get through with what they have so they don't…

    and no, they won't retake bakhmut losses would be too high.

    Log in to Reply
23. 

    @reynaldoniwane3668

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    It is not about wining anymore its about looking good so you can ask more money. Your war is now political business. Better have an election.

    Log in to Reply
24. 

    @lukefletcher9644

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    "Ukraine has made good progress?"

    They haven't even made it to the first line of defense ffs

    Log in to Reply
25. 

    @turnerthomas5627

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Only bakmut is with or near Ukraine reach

    Log in to Reply
26. 

    @Webstral

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Cluster munitions may play a useful role in killing Russian troops in their open-topped trenches, but only if the Russians have failed to create enough fighting positions with overhead cover. So far, the Russians appear to have done a good job of following their own doctrine; ergo, I'm going to say that these cluster munitions aren't intended for killing infantry in their fixed defenses. They may play a role in clearing lanes through minefields, but I'm on the fence about how reliably efficacious this might be. I think cluster munitions are aimed at two critical targets. The first is the defender's artillery. Counterbattery fire has assumed a ranking priority in Ukrainian probing operations. Cluster munitions will make CB fire considerably more effective. If the Ukrainians are shifting back to probing operations, this suggests to me that they are looking to create opportunities to destroy more of Russia's defensive indirect firepower before attempting a multi-point breakthrough. The other main target for cluster munitions will be Russian reserves moving forward in response to Ukrainian progress against the defensive line. With the US providing RT intel, the Ukrainians will enjoy excellent opportunities to strike Russian reserves and resupply efforts moving forward.

    Log in to Reply
27. 

    @Acquavallo

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    When will they learn how to pronounce Wagner? 🥲

    Log in to Reply
28. 

    @philcollins884

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    GLORY TO THE HEROES OF UKRAINE 🇺🇦

    Log in to Reply
29. 

    @philcollins884

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    OK ! ITS PRONOUNCED BACH MOOT! & ITS SPELT BAKHMUT. I SHOULDN'T BE CORRECTING A PAID REPORTER WITH SPELL CHECK, NO EXCUSE, LACK OF PROPER HOMEWORK. OTHER THAN THAT YOU DO WELL

    Log in to Reply
30. 

    @andyduhamel1925

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    UA would be wise and Im sure they will have learned the costs paid by Wagner, and use NATO doctrine on troop atriton, not to engge in costly urban warfare and surround the ciyt and choke off supply routes entirely.

    Log in to Reply
31. 

    @WeWazKangz

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Only offensive from Zelenskyy and his thugs has been blowing up a dam and bridge 🤡 🤡

    Log in to Reply
32. 

    @50_Pence

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Don't go planning any countryside walks in east Russia for the next 500 years

    Log in to Reply
33. 

    @czarcastic1458

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    F Nazilensky and his 4th Reich goose steppers.

    Log in to Reply
34. 

    @jeremyboughtono2

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Just bleed the Russians dry.

    Log in to Reply
35. 

    @kkkiren599

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Bakhmut was relevant to Wagner output. In Bakhmuts current degraded state Ukraine will naturally not lose focus and life onto meat grinding games. They have to and will think bigger. Let them play their game.

    Log in to Reply
36. 

    @michaelruscak4251

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Thanks!

    Log in to Reply
37. 

    @starwarscoppers

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    These guys are genuinely hilarious , didnt Ukraine and the Media say months ago around bakhmut tht an attritional battle favors russia because they are a bigger force/population w more sustainable military industry than ukraine and that Ukraine needs a QUICK AND DECISIVE VICTORY to be able to defeat russia??? Or is tht just me lol. Now they are switching to an "attritional style offensive" to gain ground. Genuine comedy.

    Log in to Reply
38. 

    @mourka01

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    I thought that city didn't matter

    Log in to Reply
39. 

    @Archangel657

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    So the long awaited "counter offensive" was a complete and utter failure?

    Log in to Reply
40. 

    @hatchxable

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    NO!

    Log in to Reply
41. 

    @MathijsHeideveld86

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    What do you mean "Finally"? Ukraine depends on weapons provided by the west. Why not report on all the lacking deliveries from the west instead of criticizing Ukraine… Combined arms only works with air superiority, but we the west failed to provide that… This is our shortcoming, not Ukraines.

    Log in to Reply
42. 

    @ammarhaziq919

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    and Bakhmut is stagically unimportant they said ……

    Log in to Reply
43. 

    @sebastianwrites

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    TLDR this shouldn't be a competition of popularity, but "facts!"

    ~Come on please, not a good opening?

    Log in to Reply
44. 

    @Markomilic205

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    What advances in the Bakhmut area? The Russians are capturing 10x more land daily than Ukrainians

    Log in to Reply
45. 

    @OpTiCNoobtube

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    Tired of all the war propaganda being thrown at us. I don’t care about some backwater just as most of you don’t care about other backwaters in the world

    Log in to Reply
46. 

    @Markomilic205

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    1:44 the attack of the bridge did not affect Russian logistic capabilities because the railway wasn't attacked.

    Log in to Reply
47. 

    @Markomilic205

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    00:17 How does the move to attritional warfare make sense for Ukraine? Are you an idiot?

    Log in to Reply
48. 

    @user-xu7si9dm8i

    February 10, 2024 at 2:19 pm

    More dead Ukrainians that’s all.

    Log in to Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment Login